On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 05:12:22PM +0200, Julien LEMOINE wrote: > I received a bug report on stunnel package from an user [1] that > complained > about the fact that I didn't warning about the new /etc/default/stunnel file > introduced in package (thereis a note in README.Debian and in changelog).
It's a bit rude to break people's systems without warning them about it. > Since debconf is not really appreciated for this use, what is the best > solution ? Inform users with debconf or give them informations only in > changelog and README.Debian ? What makes you think that a debconf note is inappropriate for this? It appears to be quite a common thing to do and seems helpful. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
pgpyvQ7YbxCim.pgp
Description: PGP signature
