On Friday 04 July 2003 05:59, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Yes, keep the two versions of stunnel is probably the right way to handle
> > this problem. Now the problem is that stunnel is uploaded in version 4 on
> > stunnel package. What is the correct way to reintroduce stunnel for
> > compatibility reasons ? uploading a new  stunnel3 package will not
> > resolve the problem.
>
> Epoch it and upload stunnel4 as a new package.

Thanks,

I will upload a stunnel4 package and a stunnel with Epoch tomorrow.

Best Regards.
-- 
Julien LEMOINE / SpeedBlue


Reply via email to