On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 02:59:31PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Given the tone of Driscoll's messages to us, whom are innocent > bystanders in this affair, I think your solution is quite unlikely to > happen.
Huh? What's wrong with the tone? The first message wasn't to us, it was to the spammer. It was just copied to us, albeit in a less than clueful way. The second message just said s/he didn't like the situation and asked for our help. "I am against SPAM and it hurts to have it associated with my name in any way." I can completely understand this sentiment. I also don't like it that there are zillions of spams out there purporting to come from me, and I wish I could do something about it. Richard Braakman