On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 08:29:16PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The problem is not the autobuilder infrastructure per se. It is that > > testing and unstable are largely in sync (!). This, combinded with the > > fact that testing must not have versions newer than unstable (they > > will then be rejected) means testing-security wouldn't work at the > > moment. > > How is that different from testing-proposed-updates?
Because they're ussualy for fixing bugs in testing where there is an other version in unstable? Why else would you be using testing-proposed-updates? Kurt
