> When you install an alsa-modules package for the 2.4 kernel, you get > alsa-base per the dependencies. However, when you install sarge with a > 2.6 kernel, alsa-base doesn't end up being installed. The result is that > for most sound cards, both OSS and ALSA modules end up installed, > resulting in various and random problems. To avoid that, shouldn't the > kernel-image packages for 2.6 depend on alsa-base?
Maybe it's better just not to provide oss drivers for chips supported by alsa? AFAIK OSS will be removed from kernel soon... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
