Ed Cogburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wait a second, if you *aren't* Debian, it should be *easier* for you to > provide non-free, not harder.
Permission to redistribute some bits of non-free may be specific to Debian. Alternatively, packages may be buildable but no permission to rebuild them granted. There's all sorts of potential issues with non-free licenses. This isn't part of some sort of anti-non-free campaign. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
