On 5/19/05, Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The GPL is anomalous in that the drafter has published a widely > believed, but patently false, set of claims about its legal basis in > the "FSF FAQ".
For the record, I disagree that this faq is "patently false". It is, in places, a bit simplistic, but I wouldn't advise anyone delve into those fine points of law unless they've retained the services of a lawyer (at which point the FAQ is merely an interesting commentary -- it has less weight than professional advice). Furthermore, that FAQ is far and away better than anything you've proposed. -- Raul
