Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | foo | foo-data > ---------------------+----------------------+------------------------- > foo needs foo-data | Depends: foo-data | Suggests: foo > ---------------------+----------------------+------------------------- > foo may use foo-data | Recommends: foo-data | Depends: foo > foo-data useless | | Enhances: foo [*] > without foo | | > ---------------------+----------------------+------------------------- > foo may use foo-data | Recommends: foo-data | Suggests: foo > foo-data useful | | Enhances: foo [*] > without foo | | > > The Enhances would add an extra meaning to explain why foo-data > package is either Depending or Suggesting foo, which in these cases is > not the usual Depend meaning IMHO: the data doesn't really need > anything to work :)
Sounds good. I thought you ment Enhances even with foo depending. But this way is exatly how I have in mind. This way frontends can offer the choise of installing foo-data when the user selects foo. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]