Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:19:46AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> I'm not saying that this all needs to be publicly logged. I don't give
>> a rat's ass whether it is or not. But please don't stand there saying
>> that the process is completely transparent.
>
> I don't believe I said that. I don't believe it's remotely fair to set
> the standard at the unreachable level of perfection, either.
>
> The major task of buildd maintenance (aiui) is handlings logs though,
> and that's certainly what was being complained about earlier. I'd
> be interested to see you name an area that's had anything like the
> transparency w-p provides the build process though. I guess there's
> britney, which gives public logs of what's going on, but also requires
> a degree of handholding every now and then that isn't particularly logged.
>
> Cheers,
> aj
Which in no way provides any transparency to <arch>@buildd.d.o, which
was being complained about earlier.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
