On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 05:31:40PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: > On 1/12/06, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:41:16PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:09:12PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > > Let's take this one apart and see what it is that pisses people off so > > > > much. > > > > > > I don't intend to participate in this type of email argument with you; > > > I've > > > yet to see it pay off for anyone involved. However, I will be in London > > > later this month and would be willing to use that opportunity to civilly > > > discuss your concerns face-to-face. > > > > The intent here being "stop people from scrutinising Ubuntu in public; > > get it off the lists so that it's less visible". Not likely. > > Do you want visibility or solve current problems ?
If I were interested in solving Ubuntu's problems then I would be working on Ubuntu. As people keep pointing out, Ubuntu's failure to cooperate effectively is *not* our problem - the only 'problem' that *we* have is that Ubuntu-worshippers keep showing up and proselytizing. An effective solution to this problem is to raise awareness to the point where people stop believing and start thinking. It appears to be working. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
