On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:46:06AM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:28:29AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-07 02:20]: > > > We did pick two compiler warnings and scanned the build logs of one > > > archive rebuild on alpha (64bit), where wrong code may be generated. > > > These warnings can be found in 1600 packages [4]; they are: > > > [4] http://people.debian.org/~tbm/logs/pointer/ > > > > Here is a list of maintainers and their packages which exhibit such > > warnings: > > > > Mike Hommey > > xulrunner 1.8.0.1-11 > > What I quite don't get is why xulrunner gets warnings while firefox and > thunderbird don't...
Moreover, I don't understand how you managed to build xulrunner with gcc 4.1. I just tried and got loads of error: no suitable 'operator delete' for 'whateverClass' on delete operators defined as operator delete(void *, size_t). Which will obviously fail on firefox and thunderbird as well... Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
