Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 02:17:23AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >>> Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> > So in summary, if you don't care about portability to 64-bit windows, >>> > assuming sizeof(void*) == sizeof(long) is just fine. >>> >>> Unless you compile with range checking pointers. >> >> The current implementation of range checking in gcc (mudflap) uses >> normal-sized pointers. > > Even in 32bit? How do they cram all that info in there?
By using an object database lookup. See http://gcc.fyxm.net/summit/2003/mudflap.pdf -- Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
