Art Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Excuse me for chiming in, but I think many places simply look > for the best performance and productivity/dollar(euro). We do use the PGI > compiler, > mostly because gnu had not had a f90-f95 compiler, and partly because > of, maybe, a 10% improvement in speed. > > What I find interesting is that both Fedora and Debian have similar > problems for different reasons. Debian has now stable release for > AMD64 because Sarge was released before AMD64 was really ready. This means > that we are all stuck in the beta test-site pool. It would be really nice > if Debian actually packaged up a "stable-like" version of AMD64 at the > same level as Sarge. Fedora has been moving so quickly, that they have > incorporated the same problems into a nominally stable release.
The amd64.debian.net is at the same level as sarge if you include the proposed updates. The only difference to official sarge is that the ftp-master hasn't pushed those proposed updates into our sarge yet (for which we all hate him a bit). MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]