On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 01:56:26AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This would only fix problems in experimental, lilypond is currently not > > releasable, so imaginating that the Python switch would not happen, we > > would end up without lilypond. > In my opinion, the current lilypond in Debian is not suitable for > release, even with the existing problems solved. It would not be > appropriate to release such an old version in etch, and if nothing > happens with python by the time etch is released, then lilypond should > be removed from etch. Have you told the maintainers of alml and songwrite (reverse-depends of lilypond) about this? It wouldn't be fair to them to find out at the last minute before the etch release that their packages won't be releasable because lilypond wasn't ready, when they might have been able to do something to help if they had known earlier. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
