On 2007-12-10, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think in both cases it was something like the main binary being > linked to many utility libraries (because it was easy to link it to > everything which configure found), and then the plugin calling directly > into these libs, but not being linked to them. If the main binary > didn't actually use the libs, these were stripped out, and then the > dlopening of the plugins would fail. > These were really issues in the build process, issues which would > have been caught with -z defs before --as-needed (which is why I'm > advocating usage of -z defs before --as-needed), but slipped silently > in the end package and actually hit users.
Isn't the new dpkg-shlipdeps warning about symbols it can't find ? /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
