On Wed April 2 2008 01:52:39 Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 10:24:43AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > The results are a bit misleading, because they compare the absolute > > gain. > > It's the absolute size savings that counts - that's what's going to have > the biggest impact on mirror size, mirroring time, CD set size, and > download times for users.
Lucas made a good point. Better to save 20% on ten 10MB packages than saving 10% on one 100MB package. Although we can probably have both, modulo decompression RAM issues. --Mike Bird -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
