2009/3/23 Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net>: >> Secondly, the GR process depends heavily on the possibility of developers >> to offer amendments and extra options on the ballots. In particular it >> is vital that middle-ground options get on the ballot. Requiring of them >> a high number of seconds might bar them from being on the ballot, because >> they are not preferred options, but compromises. > > I agree, and I'm a bit concerned that everybody seems to think that it's > a good idea to increasing the number of required seconds, while I really > think that it's a terrible idea.
IANADD, but I think that if the concern is that amendments aren't going to have enough seconds, you could amend the proposal not to affect them: after all once you're having a ballot, having one more option is not that huge effort more for the voter, so it seems sensible that amendments need fewer seconds... Cheers, Luca -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
