Le Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:13:45PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > On Mon, 06 Apr 2009, Charles Plessy wrote: > > I think that it is a good concept, but the linian warning has probably a > > good > > reason to exist. For instance, if a bug is closed as part of a "Team > > upload", > > won't the BTS expect a NMU acknowledgement anyway? > > IIRC that concept died when we introduced version tracking so it should > cause any problem. Bugs are always version closed (and no more tagged > fixed/fixed-in-nmu).
Good :) Does it mean that the Developers Reference must be updated? Index: pkgs.dbk =================================================================== --- pkgs.dbk (revision 6668) +++ pkgs.dbk (working copy) @@ -2073,13 +2073,6 @@ work on it. </para> -<para> -To acknowledge an NMU, include its changes and changelog entry in your next -maintainer upload. If you do not acknowledge the NMU by including the -NMU changelog entry in your changelog, the bugs will remain closed in the -BTS but will be listed as affecting your maintainer version of the package. -</para> - </section> <section id="nmu-binnmu"> By the way, the online copy is “ver. unknown”. Have a nice day, -- Charles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org