Le Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 01:12:14PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : > On Mon, Sep 28 2009, Paul Wise wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> wrote: > > > >> in my first experimentations I used DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS, but this leads > >> to the possibility of clashing with flag names that can be reserved > >> later with a different behaviour. On the other hand, if there are > >> enough packages made using the same convention, then we may set the > >> standard by our usage. Would there be other maintainers interested in > >> using a 'network' flag for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS? > > > > Just use something like DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=x-check-network until there > > is an option for this enshrined in policy. > > Creating a working example, which is used in a number of > packages (enough packages that most of the kinks in implementation of > the handling have been worked out) would be a great first step towards > getting it into policy anyway.
Hi all, since there was no ‘me too’ message in this thread from developers wanting to optionaly enable network tests, I will keep on using DEB_MAINTAINER_MODE and will not go further in proposing a new DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS flag. This said, I will be happy to update my package to use DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS in the future if some standard emerges. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org