Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > [Josselin Mouette, 2011-05-04] >> This would be a pseudo-suite, like experimental. Except that while >> experimental is built on top of unstable and filled manually by >> maintainers, rolling would be built on top of testing and filled >> semi-automatically. A rolling system would have typically 2 APT lines: >> one for testing and one for rolling. > > +1 > > [...] >> What to do during freezes >> ------------------------- >> I’m not sure we really need to do something different in times of >> freeze. Our time would be better spent by reducing the freeze time and >> making it more predictable; squeeze has been an awesome step in this >> direction. > > I'm not interested in helping f.e. with Perl bugs so once the ones > I care about are fixed, I just want to focus on Sid (i.e. upload new > upstream versions, prepare new transitions etc.) - I can wait a month or > two, but these long freezes demotivate me a lot.
While I agree with the demotivation stance, why can't those packages be uploaded to experimental, fwiw ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/iprk5f$hgt$1...@dough.gmane.org