On 05/04/2011 11:48 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > While I can sympathize with this (it's what I want as a developer), it's > certainly not a good idea in Debian in general: we have many derivatives > taking unstable/testing at various points in time, and we also want to > make testing generally usable by end-users.
*testing*, Report a bug with a RC severity and it will not migrate to testing. That is exactly what unstable is for and where the name comes from. If other people take unstable to build a distribution based on it - it is their problem. > So it's best if you consider unstable always in production-mode by > default. Let's freeze unstable today, call it stable and never touch it again. -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprints: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dc3c56f.9080...@bzed.de