hiya, On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 03:50:07PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > For the presentation side of things I am thinking one approach might be > to move UbuntuDiff[8] to the QA infrastructure, generalise it and > enhance it for this purpose. This will necessarily include mechanisms to > mark patches as having been dealt with or ignorable.
I think it's also worth some consideration about if/how it could be integrated with the Debian patch-tracker service (or perhaps supercede said service if it made more sense). Without thinking super hard on it it seems like it could have some nice effects on cross-distro participation by giving an extra incentive to share/markup patches, and to a lesser extent even the same source packages. Just thought I'd throw that in there anyway... sean -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111025085844.ga16...@cobija.connexer.com