Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> writes: > Uoti Urpala wrote: >> >>Who's the one choosing his preferred configuration format based on the >>limitations of his preferred packaging system here? Hint: it's not Red >>Hat. > > *yawn* > > When you've got something constructive to add to Debian development, > let us know. Until that point, please go away and stop trolling.
There were a few useful lines in the mail you replied to, which, I believe, were constructive: ] Machine-specific configuration belongs in /etc. The default behavior of ] the tools doesn't. ] ] Josh Triplett provided multiple technical reasons why etc-overrides-lib ] is preferable. I happen to agree with the first assertion, for various (highly subjective) reasons, and Josh's reasons[1] are worthy of consideration too. [1]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/05/msg00365.html -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/873979dm25....@luthien.mhp
