On 05/31/2012 10:52 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Please note that "badly maintained" is something quite different from
> "not maintained". AFAICS, the package we are talking about is not
> affected by severe or critical bugs. 

That's a mater of views. #470294 should be made RC IMO.
Or is writing to /usr not a good candidate for an RC bug?
I thought this was a "serious violation of the policy". Am I wrong?

Cheers,

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fc7b889.3000...@debian.org

Reply via email to