> >>> Some people asked for a thread summary. So here it is. > >> Seriously, can't you even read what's written to you? > > > > Yes, I know it was a biased summary. > > I think you might start to piss off a few people now... > > Look at what you are quoting above. You introduced your biased summary > like this: > > "Some people asked for a thread summary. So here it is.". > > I will refrain from further comments. People can judge for themselves.
I think that it is really great that Serge wrote a summary. Serge, I thank you a lot. Your summary may not be prefect, but as it was suggested, there are tools like wiki.debian.org if there is some will to make a more structured document. Roger's email where he announced that the defaults were reverted was also very informative, as it provided a broader overview of why there are filesystems on tmpfs, and what is the role of /tmp in that context. In the absence of a final combined summary, I suggest to link to the ones of Roger, Serge and Adam in the next "Developers News". http://wiki.debian.org/DeveloperNews#Using_RAM_for_temporary_files_.3F There are many long threads on -devel that are difficult to follow because of their large quantities of messages, to the point that I would almost call this a discrimination in the sense of our recent GR: I think it is pushing out contributions that we could have received if we self-moderated these posting bursts. For that reason, even if they are not perfect, I think that summaries are very welcome. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120610233432.gb7...@falafel.plessy.net