]] Howard Chu [...]
> >>> If not, then > >>> what is the point of the AGPL? To protect C-R-U? > >>> > >>> I am not suggesting that this is absolutely not modification by Company A. > >>> However, to a non-lawyer like me, it sure _looks_ like a big hole. > > I don't see any hole. If C-R-U did the modifications then they are > obligated to publish the source code, by virtue of the fact that > giving the modified code to Company A is distributing it. They're only obliged to give the source to the people they distribute the binaries to, or who accesses the system over a network, as I understnad it? So Company A gets the source from C-R-U under those terms and uses what they got, unmodified, from «upstream» and as I understand this subthread, they're under no obligation to then publish the source? -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ppuolt19....@xoog.err.no
