Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>> The problem is that some people bitch endlessly abut how evil systemd is
>> _instead_of_ producing software (not just patches) to replace what
>> systemd offers.
>
>Abstracting away from your somewhat offensive choice of language, that's
>a good point.  As far as I'm aware, the only major distribution that has

Eh, why would I need to write anything? BSD init WFM. SYSV init with
file-rc WFM unless someone breaks it again. I can live with SYSV init
with sysv-rc, if it must be (but then, please, no parallel boot). I
believe I could live with runit as init.

>been doing the right thing is OpenWRT, which has recently switched to
>"procd", a locally developed init replacement.

procd… ubus… *shudder* but at least they're consistent.
OpenWrt has been doing their own way for some time already.

bye,
//mirabilos


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/lp6908$sp4$1...@ger.gmane.org

Reply via email to