2014-11-11 22:26 GMT+01:00 Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org>: > Hello,
Hello Raphael, > following the initial discussion we had in August > (https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/08/thrd2.html#00499), I have > written a first draft of the Debian Enhancement Proposal that I suggested. > It's now online at http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep14 and also attached > below so that you can easily reply and comment. Thanks for this much-needed DEP! [...] > QUESTION: some people have argued to use debian/master as the latest > packaging targets sometimes sid and sometimes experimental. Should we > standardize on this? Or should we explicitly allow this as an alternative? I prefer as much standardization as possible. debian/sid should not be a particular case. [...] A paragraph about repacked upstream is needed. A lot of packages are currently stripped for minified JS, non-free additions, included RFCs, ... What would the upstream/1.x branch be then? Maybe add an upstream/1.x+debian branch? Also, the vendor/* branches heads should be at a descendent commit of the corresponding upstream branch, diffing only by the debian dir. Regards -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAFX5sbzieQ75nT8xBa3GMw-gzd-uGFy2fzSmx5A=R=1uzfs...@mail.gmail.com
