On 21.11.2014 18:01, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org>, 2014-11-21, 14:04: >> Sparc is definitely not ok. For evidence, see #721617, liblo was >> trying to fetch a double from a 4-byte aligned address. Experience >> with liblo shows that other architectures are just fine (or at least >> are just slower) with this type of unalignment. > > IME, sprac buildds are the only ones where where unaligned access in a > build-time test suite triggers SIGBUS/SIGSEGV. > > Now that sparc is no long a release architecture, these kind of problems > are likely to go unnoticed. :-( >
the not yet released gcc 5.0 has -fsanitize=alignment which can tell you about unaligned access on all arches, can be quite useful if you care about it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/546f82e8.7060...@googlemail.com