Karsten Merker wrote: > while this probably works resonably well for (semi-)fixed devices > like onboard-NICs and PCI/PCIe cards, it results in a completely > unsuitable behaviour with pluggable devices such as USB network > adapters. When using ifnames, the interface name depends on the > USB port into which the device is currently plugged and the > interface name changes when one uses a USB hub or plugs the > device into another host port. This would mean that a user would > always have to plug his USB network device into the same port > that was used during initial setup to keep it working, and > one-off use of a USB hub would require changing the network > configuration. Despite the problems of the MAC-based system > that we use currently, the ifnames method appears way worse > to me than what we have now.
That would only be a problem if you're using ifupdown and its hardcoded network interface names. Other network software handles dynamic names. Without this, you can't reliably use a system with *two* USB network devices, because they won't consistently come up with the same names. Or, for that matter, a system with a built-in network interface and a USB network interface. - Josh Triplett -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150508174201.GA3687@jtriplet-mobl1