Karsten Merker wrote:
> while this probably works resonably well for (semi-)fixed devices
> like onboard-NICs and PCI/PCIe cards, it results in a completely
> unsuitable behaviour with pluggable devices such as USB network
> adapters.  When using ifnames, the interface name depends on the
> USB port into which the device is currently plugged and the
> interface name changes when one uses a USB hub or plugs the
> device into another host port.  This would mean that a user would
> always have to plug his USB network device into the same port
> that was used during initial setup to keep it working, and
> one-off use of a USB hub would require changing the network
> configuration.  Despite the problems of the MAC-based system
> that we use currently, the ifnames method appears way worse
> to me than what we have now.

That would only be a problem if you're using ifupdown and its hardcoded
network interface names.  Other network software handles dynamic names.

Without this, you can't reliably use a system with *two* USB network
devices, because they won't consistently come up with the same names.
Or, for that matter, a system with a built-in network interface and a
USB network interface.

- Josh Triplett


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150508174201.GA3687@jtriplet-mobl1

Reply via email to