On 2016-01-04 23:14:11 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 07:45:37AM +0000, Niels Thykier wrote: > > Your second item has been brought up before with different > > focus/rationale/purpose. At least I remember there being an interest > > in splitting "non-free" into "non-free/firmware" vs. various other > > non-free sub components. > > Another one that is worth mentioning here --- which I discussed in the > context of non-free.org with Dafydd Harries and others --- is > introducing a debtags facet to capture the reason why a package is in > non-free. At least two hierarchies come to mind: 1) which point of DFSG > is not respected, and 2) which one of the 4 freedoms are not granted.
And could something similar be done for free packages that can download non-free stuff? -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)