>> It'd be nice if, after all this discussion, you stated clearly whether >> you plan to change something or not. > > Isn't that what I just did?
No, not exactly. You stated what you want to do in *Buster*, but not whether it's supposed to stay broken all the way until then. I guess this email of yours does make it clear, though. I guess we should then move the discussion from "should libssl support TLS 1.0/1.1" to "how do we get a system again that works with the not-so-up-to-date rest of the world". At least I think our social contract demands we offer a *working*" ssl setup: ... We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software community. We will place their interests first in our priorities. We will support the needs of our users for operation in many different kinds of computing environments. ... Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL