On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 16:59:58 +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Hi, > > just to be sure, that this is not a problem: > > There used to be a package "dino" in Debian until jessie. Upstream > development dried up years ago and dino became extinct. > > Recently, a new "dino" appeared on the surface of earth, which is a > completely different program. Like git vs git or node vs node, but > with only one contender. > > I would package the new dino under this name, because I don't think > there is a conflict. > > Any objections? > I think reusing package names for a different purpose is very bad, in almost all cases. Pretty sure including this one.
Cheers, Julien