On Saturday, 19 August 2023 11:14:02 CEST Andreas Metzler wrote: > > What is the recommended/appropriate way to deal with such issues? > > The agreed reached was not "let's ignore it, lintian has been warning > about it". Instead a way forward that /should/ have avoided any breakage > (versioned provides) was proposed and chosen.
Ah, the versioned provides is what makes it *not* FTBFS! I missed that as had been added on 2021-12-28 already (bug #1002049) and I didn't look back in the history far enough. (I may also not have made the connection though) Thanks :-)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
