> Would anyone object if kernel 2.2 were packaged up at least as a > kernel-source package for slink? 2.0.3x would remain slink's default kernel, > would be used on the boot disks, etc, but this would let people get ahold of > kernel 2.2 easily on a debian cdrom, and it would let us say that debian > supports 2.2. (I was at a LUG meeting the other day, and I was asked about > this very thing a couple of times; people obviously care about it.)
Not that it matters, really. My only worry is that if somebody compiles the kernel, they will expect it to work. I think it's best to leave 2.2 completely in unstable. It's still available there and will have better support. Brian ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tired of spam? See what you can do to fight it at: http://www.cauce.org/