Le 05/12/2017 à 14:09, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hmmm, the lib/batik*.jar files removed from the upstream tarball contain > files from 2008 - one of these has version 1.7 in the file name while I > was building against 1.9. > > Should I approach upstream about this issue? I'm not sure whether I'll > just get the hint to use JAR files shipped with the source tarball ... > :-(
First check if batik-util.jar is on the classpath. The missing class XMLConstants reported by javac is in this jar.