On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:36:11 CET solitone wrote: > On Monday, 20 March 2017 16:23:06 CET Luigi Toscano wrote: > > > Anyway, for the reason you gave, I think it would be a good thing if > > > that > > > was included in stretch. It might give a better user experience. > > > > I think it's a bit too late given the release cycle, but I'm not a > > packager > > for those components. > > I fear that too. It would be nice thought that it'd be at least included in > sid, so that we could backport it to stretch.
I guess you mean experimental. That will happen for sure when sid is open again for changes after the release; using sid now means some more complications in case a fix needs to go directly into testing and then stable. > > As well as okular, kde-baseapps-bin (providing kdialog) would need an > upgrade to 16.12 to take advantage of kf5. That would be more complicated: kde-baseapps does not exist anymore, it has been split into its components (konqueror, kfind, keditbookmarks, kdialog). -- Luigi