Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2023 07:41:49 +0200
with message-id <znxkhcthkbfti...@eldamar.lan>
and subject line Re: Bug#1043438: linux-headers-amd64: Package dependecy is 
currently broken
has caused the Debian Bug report #1043438,
regarding linux-headers-amd64 cannot be upgraded with/after kernel upgrade
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1043438: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1043438
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-headers-amd64
Version: 6.1.38-2
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: linuxma...@gmail.com

Dear Maintainer,

   * What led up to the situation?
      * I installed a kernel upgrade, as prompted.
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
      * Nothing at the moment, trying to manual install (sudo apt install
linux-headers-amd64) gets the error: "The following packages have unmet
dependencies: linux-headers-amd64 : Depends: linux-headers-6.1.0-11-amd64 (=
6.1.38-3) but it is not going to be installed"
   * What was the outcome of this action?
      * Upgrade unable to complete and NVIDIA GPU on laptop unable to be used
as a result.
   * What outcome did you expect instead?
      * The package would be upgraded with the rest of the kernel and if that
wasn't possible, the kernel would not have been upgraded.

The output of "uname -a":

Linux elliot-debian 6.1.0-11-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.38-3
(2023-08-07) x86_64 GNU/Linux


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.1
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-11-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages linux-headers-amd64 depends on:
ii  linux-headers-6.1.0-10-amd64  6.1.38-2

linux-headers-amd64 recommends no packages.

linux-headers-amd64 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 12:33:54AM -0500, Caleb McKay wrote:
> Package: linux-headers-amd64
> Version: 6.1.38-3
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-Cc: ca...@candj.us
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
> 
>    * What led up to the situation?
> Atempted to install package linux-headers-amd64 (6.1.38-3)
>    * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
>      ineffective)?
> Package fails to install because it depends on linux-headers-6.1.0-11-amd64 
> (6.1.38-3) but only version 6.1.38-4 is available in the archive.
>    * What was the outcome of this action?
> Package fails to install with error:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  linux-headers-amd64 : Depends: linux-headers-6.1.0-11-amd64 (= 6.1.38-3) but 
> 6.1.38-4 is to be installed
>    * What outcome did you expect instead?
> Package to install.

This is known, there was a hick-up on releasing the linux updates
which should be resolved as soon FTP master unbreak the situation.
Then a regular DSA announcement will go out.

Regards,
Salvatore

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to