Quoting Justin B Rye ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> > "linux tree" is incorrect, imho. That's the Linux kernel source tree,
> > I think
> 
> RHCS isn't Section: devel, so it would be good if it could avoid
> this jargon - only dogs and programmers do things against trees.

In case you don't read blogs, that one made my day. Please just
imagine myself alone hacking at 07:00am in my daily train to work and
suddenly laughing out loud and looking silly to other train
apssengers, *because of you*..:-)


> Unfortunately I'm not confident I can translate "compiling an
> out-of-tree module against a source tree" into English...

We should some day invent an [EMAIL PROTECTED] locale...

Otherwise, as usual, all suggestions adopted (unless I forgot some: I
usually apply changes manually).




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to