On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:44:00AM +0200, Mike and Willi Knuth wrote: > > Is there any good reason to castrate a kernel this way? > > Please fix your attitude. It is unacceptable to incriminate the > maintainer of a package for unnoticed or unfixed bugs, especially in > highly expermental software. funnily upstream gave no default on that Kconfig option, thus it defaults to no. next rc3 has it set to modular.
anyway next time a polite mail would do a better job. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
