Dear Justin, On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 05:10:02PM +0000, Justin B Rye wrote: > Okay! Suggested version attached.
<3 thank you very much for that lovely & caring review! I love all your
changes and will upload shortly! 🤗
> > Description: Sequoia's reimplementation of the GnuPG cli tools (metapackage)
> An initialism, so definitely capitalised.
>
> It's a bit long; maybe the "reimplementation" part can wait for the
> long description:
> Description: Sequoia's GnuPG CLI tools (metapackage)
agreed.
> Fair enough, this all looks intelligible. I'll deal with the quoted
> descriptions below, but notice that one of them is a "what it is" noun
> phrase while the other is a "what it's for" verb phrase - the list
> would read a bit more smoothly if they were syntactically parallel.
I knew you would find these inconsistancies.. thank you.
[...]
> But this is essentially repeating the previous paragraph, while
> slightly contradicting it. Couldn't we merge the two paragraphs as
> something like
>
> gpg-sq is Sequoia's alternative implementation of a tool following
> the GnuPG command line interface. It provides a drop-in but not
> feature-complete.replacement for the GnuPG project's gpg.
YES.
[...]
> The previous two descriptions both talked about themselves as packages
> when it would make things simpler to keep the focus on the utilities
> they contained; this one does some administrative hocus-pocus, so if
> anything it would make *more* sense for it to start with "this
> package" (and an active verb).
:)) thank you, again. I knew it needed someone to look from the distance
to have this perspective and be able to express it / point out whats
wrong with the previous version.
> (g10code? Oh, okay, "ɡ10ᶜᵒᵈᵉ GMBH".)
well spotted! :)
*thank you*, ***again!***
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
Make racists afraid again.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
