Messages by Date
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Bernhard R. Link
-
2004/09/02
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Bernhard R. Link
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Raul Miller
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Raul Miller
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Måns Rullgård
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Raul Miller
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Måns Rullgård
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Raul Miller
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Steve McIntyre
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Raul Miller
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Raul Miller
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Måns Rullgård
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Andrew Suffield
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Bas Zoetekouw
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Steve McIntyre
-
2004/09/02
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Måns Rullgård
-
2004/09/01
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
MJ Ray
-
2004/09/01
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Glenn Maynard
-
2004/09/01
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/09/01
Re: cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Måns Rullgård
-
2004/09/01
cdrecord: weird GPL interpretation
Francesco Poli
-
2004/09/01
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Adam McKenna
-
2004/09/01
Re: Web application licenses
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/09/01
Re: Web application licenses
Josh Triplett
-
2004/08/31
Re: Web application licenses
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/31
Re: Web application licenses
Josh Triplett
-
2004/08/31
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/30
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Adam McKenna
-
2004/08/30
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/30
Re: GPL Compatibility of IFRIT License
Nathanael Nerode
-
2004/08/30
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Adam McKenna
-
2004/08/30
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Adam McKenna
-
2004/08/30
Re: GPL Compatibility of IFRIT License
Mark Hymers
-
2004/08/30
Re: GPL Compatibility of IFRIT License
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/30
GPL Compatibility of IFRIT License
Mark Hymers
-
2004/08/29
Change of address
nfo
-
2004/08/28
Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal)
Glenn Maynard
-
2004/08/28
Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal)
Barak Pearlmutter
-
2004/08/28
Re: Answer Re: Does the "GPL version choice" impact GPL-compatibility?
Nathanael Nerode
-
2004/08/28
Re: Answer Re: Does the "GPL version choice" impact GPL-compatibility?
Glenn Maynard
-
2004/08/28
Re: miboot floppies and non-free apple boot sector.
Nathanael Nerode
-
2004/08/28
Answer Re: Does the "GPL version choice" impact GPL-compatibility?
Nathanael Nerode
-
2004/08/27
Re: miboot floppies and non-free apple boot sector.
Sven Luther
-
2004/08/27
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Josh Triplett
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Adam Sampson
-
2004/08/27
Re: [gnu.org #209128] Does the "GPL version choice" impact GPL-compatibility?
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/27
[gnu.org #209128] Does the "GPL version choice" impact GPL-compatibility?
Glenn Maynard
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
David Schleef
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Michael Poole
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Adam Sampson
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Michael Poole
-
2004/08/27
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Francesco Poli
-
2004/08/27
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Francesco Poli
-
2004/08/27
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Francesco Poli
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Michael Poole
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/27
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/27
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/27
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Sven Luther
-
2004/08/27
Re: Does the "GPL version choice" impact GPL-compatibility?
Bernhard R. Link
-
2004/08/27
Re: Does the "GPL version choice" impact GPL-compatibility?
Bernhard R. Link
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Glenn Maynard
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Glenn Maynard
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Glenn Maynard
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Glenn Maynard
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Adam McKenna
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/26
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/26
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Matthew Garrett
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version"
Marco Franzen
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal)
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal)
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/26
Re: Does the "GPL version choice" impact GPL-compatibility?
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal)
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Marco Franzen
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Glenn Maynard
-
2004/08/26
Re: Does the "GPL version choice" impact GPL-compatibility?
Glenn Maynard
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal)
Michael Poole
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal)
Adam McKenna
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal)
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/26
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal)
Michael Poole
-
2004/08/26
Re: GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal)
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/26
GPL "or any greater version" (was: NEW ocaml licence proposal)
Michael Poole
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Steve McIntyre
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Michael Poole
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Sven Luther
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/26
miboot floppies and non-free apple boot sector.
Sven Luther
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Sven Luther
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Sven Luther
-
2004/08/26
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/26
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Sven Luther
-
2004/08/26
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Matthew Garrett
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Steve McIntyre
-
2004/08/26
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Matthew Garrett
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/26
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/26
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/26
Re-Fi and save
Shirley Rodriguez
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Sven Luther
-
2004/08/26
Re: Does the "GPL version choice" impact GPL-compatibility?
Bernhard R. Link
-
2004/08/26
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Bernhard R. Link
-
2004/08/25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Sven Luther
-
2004/08/25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Glenn Maynard
-
2004/08/25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Matthew Garrett
-
2004/08/25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Matthew Garrett
-
2004/08/25
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/25
Does the "GPL version choice" impact GPL-compatibility?
Glenn Maynard
-
2004/08/25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Matthew Garrett
-
2004/08/25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/25
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Adam McKenna
-
2004/08/25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Matthew Garrett
-
2004/08/25
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Glenn Maynard
-
2004/08/25
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/25
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/25
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Glenn Maynard
-
2004/08/25
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/25
■6千万円以上簡単収入の 方法はあります。■5億9 千万円証拠有収入の証拠で 出来る■在宅で簡単にでき るビックビジネスの方法■ 景気の波に便乗する方法■ 20歳以上男女は在宅経営 者になる申し込み出来る■
経済文庫メルマガ担当
-
2004/08/25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Matthew Garrett
-
2004/08/25
Get a new roof?
M. W. Thompson
-
2004/08/25
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Sven Luther
-
2004/08/25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/25
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/25
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Andrew Suffield
-
2004/08/25
This weeks specials sedulous
Hattie Carney
-
2004/08/25
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Steve McIntyre
-
2004/08/24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Glenn Maynard
-
2004/08/24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Glenn Maynard
-
2004/08/24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Andrew Suffield
-
2004/08/24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Claus Färber
-
2004/08/24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Steve McIntyre
-
2004/08/24
Re: Bits from debian-legal between 2004-08-16 and 2004-08-22
MJ Ray
-
2004/08/24
Re: Bits from debian-legal between 2004-08-16 and 2004-08-22
Andrew Suffield
-
2004/08/24
Bits from debian-legal between 2004-08-16 and 2004-08-22
MJ Ray
-
2004/08/24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
MJ Ray
-
2004/08/24
Re: CeCILL again...
Glenn Maynard
-
2004/08/24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Glenn Maynard
-
2004/08/24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Matthew Garrett
-
2004/08/24
Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
Raul Miller
-
2004/08/24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Andrew Suffield
-
2004/08/24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Andrew Suffield
-
2004/08/24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Brian Thomas Sniffen
-
2004/08/24
Re: Suggestions of David Nusinow, was: RPSL and DFSG-compliance - choice of venue
Andrew Suffield
[Earlier messages] [Later messages]