On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 13:04:07 +1000,
> Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I intend to rename the glut packages from
> >  glutg3
> >  glutg3-dev
> > to
> >  libglut3
> >  libglut-dev
> > to follow the convention for library package naming.
> I prefer libglut3-dev .

We should make versioned -dev (binary) packages the exception, not the norm.
libglut-dev is better. Think about libglut3-dev, libglut4-dev,
libglut5-dev etc. and how libglut-dev makes upgrades much easier.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to