Hi Luis, On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 06:15:15PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > Yes, Lars has stated his intention to completely remove this rendering > engine.
> To do so, I'd assume the right way to go would be to turn -gtkhtml > into a dummy package that pulls -xulrunner in. > In that case, the separate liferea-xulrunner package would be rather > pointless, as liferea would just pull it inconditionally. Should both > packages be just merged into one? Would *that* be too much of a change > to get into etch? It would be less disruptive to drop the liferea-gtkhtml package or make it an empty package depending on liferea-xulrunner, rather than to risk getting package relationships wrong when merging the contents. Please go for one of those first options. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
