On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 12:23:39PM +0100, David Given wrote:
> (Incidentally, the more I look at fakechroot the more I'm coming to believe
> that it's no use for anything whatsoever. The security aspects of it are...
> erm... nil; it's trivial for the client app to break out of its jail. Is this
> a potential problem?)

No, because it's not meant to provide security, just like fakeroot isn't
meant to provide real root privs.

- Matt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to