tags 665199 - patch pending
thanks

On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 01:40:52AM -0300, gustavo panizzo <gfa> wrote:

> I've prepared an NMU for openldap (versioned as 2.4.31-1.1)
> attached is the diff between the sources as nmudiff shows 

Have you tested this patch?  Because 'upgrade' is not the argument passed to
postinst scripts on upgrade; this appears to be a complete no-op.

Also, the upgrade case is already handled in the
postinst_upgrade_configuration function.  If load_databases needs to be done
including when the database format has not changed, this should be handled
here.

This change should not be uploaded to unstable.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com                                     vor...@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to