Hi!



On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 4:19 AM Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote:

> On 3/13/24 18:34, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064979
> >
> > Would some of you who are pushing so hard to change the policy for
> Uploaders/
> > Maintainer in the team please step up and take over this package.  It
> really
> > needs updated to the new upstream release (blocking both aioquic and
> > dnspythong for me, I don't know about others).
> >
> > I haven't done a comprehensive check, but I think morph asked for all
> the leaf
> > packages he was maintaining in the team to be removed from the archive
> and is
> > removing himself from uploaders/maintainer on others.
> >
> > You all made this mess.  Please clean it up.
>
> Absolutely not. Sandro did. There's btw absolutely no reason to declare
> a package as "orphan" if it is supposed to be team maintained. It's also
> a very bad behavior to do this silently, without telling the team about
> it, or taking part of the thread. I very much regret things are
> happening this way, but I don't think the rest of the team should be
> held responsible.
>
> If you have the list of the packages matching what you are saying,
> please do share.
>

I think you are looking for this
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2024/03/msg00045.html

>
> On 3/14/24 08:52, Andreas Tille wrote:
>  > I would have prefered to
>  > read constructive arguments instead of silent leaving the team (in the
>  > sense of not informing the team mailing list about the leave).
>
> Me too. But I'm not surprised.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>
>

Reply via email to