> On šeštadienis 27 Vasaris 2010 13:32:27 Thomas Koch wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I don't believe, that eliminating the soprano-daemon -> libsoprano4 > > dependency is a solution. ldd shows, that the shared libraries included > > in soprano-daemon depend on libsoprano4. > > You should rather change the dependency from libsoprano4 to > > soprano-daemon into a recommendation. > > Please justify your opinion. On the contrary, I believe soprano-daemon is > useless as a standalone package and libsoprano4 is a lot more important.
Your statement is confusing. You're perfectly right, that soprano-daemon can not work without libsoprano4. Therefor I asked you, to put libsoprano4 in the dependency list for soprano-daemon. You do even install binaries to /usr/bin that depend on libsoprano. However there's the problem with the circular dependency. Since soprano-daemon must depend on libsoprano4, you can only delete the opposite dependecy, from libsoprano4 to soprano-daemon. If libsoprano4 also depends on soprano-daemon, then there's no reason to build two separate packages in the first place and you merge them into one package. Best regards, Thomas Koch, http://www.koch.ro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201002271324.26151.tho...@koch.ro