On jeudi 12 juillet 2018 18:28:21 BST Sune Vuorela wrote: > On Wednesday, July 11, 2018 10:08:23 PM CEST Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > Ideally QT_RCC_SOURCE_DATE_OVERRIDE would get set based on > > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, otherwise build tools have an arbitrary growing > > No. As explained, we need to look at each individual package to check if the > timestamp is actually used for anything. It can be. It probably is. > > I think a better fix might be to specifically mark in the rcc file if the > dates are important or not. But it requires involvement upstream. (Or maybe > if the rcc file is autogenerated or not). I don't think it is a problem for > non- autogenerated rcc files.
Agreed, it's only a problem for files autogenerated at build time. rcc on a file that's part of the source tarball is gonna give a reproducible result. Best regards, Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.