On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 09:56:58PM +0100, Adeodato Sim� wrote: > > Supposed that we're trying to introduce new meta package for > > novice's convenience, I feel ruby1.8-core would be better and > > wonder ruby1.8-core depends/recommends ri1.8 as well and > > recommends/suggests ruby1.8-examples and ruby1.8-elisp. > > Well, sounds like a good compromise. Would 'ruby' recommend > 'ruby-core'?
If ruby is going to be the package.. why would ik recommend the core? It can't do with out, it breaks the policy definition of Recommends. Paul -- Student @ Eindhoven | JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Technology, The Netherlands | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux <<< | GnuPG: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
